Archive for the ‘fsem100j’ Category

Still Made in the U.S.A.

October 24, 2006

There’s a fascinating series in this week’s Wall Street Journal on manufacturing in the U.S. I tagged the first installment today with our class tag, FSEM100j. Apparently, manufacturing isn’t dead in the U.S. yet. What do these companies have to teach us about how to compete with lower cost workers in the rest of the world? Stay tuned and we’ll find out.

My Research Topic

October 19, 2006

I plan to do my own expert study at the same time that you guys are doing yours. The question I want to explore is the effect of globalization on wages in the U.S. and abroad. Some people see globalization as a “race to the bottom”; after all, if foreigners will do the same job as Americans, business will naturally want to outsource. The only way Americans will keep jobs is if they’re willing to work for the same wages as Indians or Chinese do. Or so the argument goes.

Friedman, by contrast, argues that globalization is a “race to the top” in which outsourcing will allow foreign wages to catch up with those in the developed world.

So which is it? A race to the bottom or a race to the top?  Stay tuned…

When the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal Agree, What Should One Conclude?

October 17, 2006

Both the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal have recently published articles on the upcoming decision to repeal or maintain one of the many tariffs on steel. What does it mean when the “liberal” Post and the “conservative” Journal come to the same conclusion–that the steel tariff has outlived its usefulness? I’ll leave it up to you to decide.

Technology Changes the World in a Big Way for a Small Group

October 17, 2006

There have been a number of recent really thought-provoking (at least for me) newspaper articles about globalization. I tagged them via del.icio.us but wanted to blog specifically about a couple. The first one was For India’s Traditional Fishermen, Cell Phones Deliver a Sea Change. What struck me about this article was how a small but profound technology that most of us take for granted could have a huge impact on the economic lives of a group of people in the developing world.

Clearly, the fishermen will gain here, but it’s not merely at the expense of the fish wholesalers. Rather, there’s a much more powerful dynamic at work here. This scenario is not a zero sum game. The advent of cellphones turns fishing into a much more competitive industry, where fishermen will end up selling in ports where the demand is highest. This should result in a net creation of economic value, not just a transfer of existing wealth from wholesalers to fishermen.

2006 Nobel Peace Prize

October 17, 2006

The winner is…Dr. Muhammad Yunus, an economist from Bangladesh. This is the first time in memory that economists have won two different nobels in the same year. More importantly, next time you think that a single person, even you, can’t change the world, think about this.

International Trade Story

September 29, 2006

Phil Miller at Market Power reports on a story about tutors for U.S. secondary school students available on-line for only $2.50 an hour. How do you suppose they manage that?

Man Bites Dog

September 29, 2006

I had dinner with a friend and his mother (who I also know) tonight. In the conversation, she mentioned that her other son, who lives in Texas, had just found a job–he is a computer engineer who, for the last few years, has been working in a series of temporary jobs as a contract employee with salary but no benefits. His previous job ended a week ago, and he was very pleased to get a new job, a “real job” his mother explained with salary, benefits and no expiration date. Why am I telling this? Oh, the firm who hired him is from India. They are located there, and he is in Texas–a new twist on in-sourcing.

International Voices

September 5, 2006

This evening, I’ve been reading the blog I’ve chosen to follow: PostGlobal, which you can see in my blogroll at right (hopefully!).  The particular format this blog uses is to post a provocative question for a panel of experts to respond to.  The public is also invited to join in.  The topic if this discussion is whether tribal identities are becoming stronger as nation states weaken.  (The context for this is that some have argued that globalization tends to weaken nation states–for example, as Europeans buy into the European Union, they lose loyalty for their countries.  That’s the argument anyway.)

The discussion by the panelists was pretty good, but what I found absolutely fascinating were the comments by people from around the world, whose background and viewpoints differ widely from both the experts and mine.  That may be the real strength of blogs from a learning perspective.  I expect to learn alot from the blog this semester.